New Mexico Board of Examiners for Architects |
| Board
Mailing Address:
New Mexico Board of Examiners for Architects, PO Box 509, Santa Fe, NM
87504 Board Physical Address: 491 Old Santa Fe Trail, Lamy Building, 2nd Floor North, Santa Fe, NM 87501 Phone: 505-827-6375 Fax: 505-827-6373 Business Hours: 8-Noon, 1-5PM Mountain Time, Monday - Friday Email: nmbea@state.nm.us |
![]() |
In November of 2001 NMBEA sent out a registration renewal packet that also contained a survey for our registrants. The response percentage was statistically very high and the Board thanks its registrants for their replies.
This
article contains a breakdown of the questions and the numbers and percentages
of the responses. There were only four questions on the survey, but the results
will be of interest to those practicing the profession and to the general
public as well, particularly in the responses to the question of "what
do you think is the single-most important issue in the practice of architecture
today?"
1. When two
architectural firms are associating on a project do you think that multiple
seals should be allowed on construction documents so that permitting authorities
are aware of the involvement and responsibility of both firms?
1339
replies:
Yes: 793; No: 546
2. What is
the single-most important issue in the practice of architecture today?
The top concern of registrants (149) was in public
awareness of the role and value of the architect. Several respondents
cited the lack of design and planning education for the general school population,
US tourism that does not promote architectural tourism, and AIA advertisements
that seem removed from the everyday concerns of the public.
"The public needs to be informed more of what architecture is and what
architects do. It is still a very 'private' and 'quiet' profession."
122 responded that architects faced increased service expectations and more responsibilities, but at lower fees. 110 raised the issue of increased and long-term liability with increased responsibilities. 15 others mentioned other legal problems and 7 specifically mentioned the Retainage Act.
97
raised a variety of business-related issues. Topping the concerns
was finding competent staff and the cost of training. Repeatedly registrants
expressed a concern about the gap between education and practice and the lack
of any business education. Other issues were lack of time, too much paperwork,
maintaining a team effort, accountability, business costs, collecting fees,
changing delivery systems, and quality control versus deadlines.
"...balancing 'responsible charge' criteria in a corporate, geographically
distributed practice."
96
cited sustainability, re-urbanization, smart building, and affordability.
8 more raised the problem of increased construction costs resulting in the
use of inferior materials that cut the life and raise maintenance costs of
a building.
"I would like to see the NMBEA somehow support the up & coming
green builder rating program
."
"We need to really educate the clients re: toxic runoff and require certain
'green features' in the zoning and/or permit process for large corporate or
developer projects."
"Architects' 'generalist' skills have the potential to provide leadership
to interdisciplinary teams
."
21
worried about the state of the economy, whether small firms would survive,
and the possible loss of new design ideas and innovations.
"Community, culture, and environment are not stressed enough in design/specification/administration."
47
cited a concern for integrity and ethics in the profession and 9 raised the
issue of competitive tactics.
"This is all rather un-American, but I think the German idea of fixed
fees and centralized planning does remove their architects from the need to
pump out environmentally insensitive and poorly integrated designs to remain
'competitive'".
119
raised the issue of quality and maintaining the highest standards throughout
the profession. Many of these cited the struggle of maintaining
a long-view while solving short-term problems. 41 responded the most significant
issue was health/safety/ welfare. An additional 13 raised the issue of designing
for security in post 9/11.
"Right behind 'life safety' is 'margin of safety'. Many or most buildings
reduce life safety minimum requirements into maximum requirements and then
try to cut corners down from that as a starting point
."
"A good building does not exist in a vacuum."
"Assuming that licensed architects are 'qualified' very few understand
codes, relationships of documents, construction (what people in the field
really need to construct not just 500 lbs of paper and egos."
"Most buildings are conceived weakly, built poorly, and perform badly."
79
cited the issue of continuing education with
some for or against, but most indicating that there needs to be uniformity
across states, better quality/meaningful offerings, and easier reporting mechanisms.
"The profession today contains so many specialties that a general
practice is difficult to sustain, so dependence on educational opportunities
is imperative to keep abreast of what an architect needs to stay 'intact'.
71
mentioned the encroachment of other professions. 44 mentioned the
diminished authority, rise of 3rd party managers, and the power of developers
(one architect wrote of feeling devalued and marginalized). 6 mentioned problems
interfacing with engineers. 12 mentioned the lack of quality and increased
authority of contractors.
38 specifically mentioned design/build.
"Licensing interior designers
amounts to teaching them 10-20%
of the HSW, code, ethics, and technical knowledge architects learn in college
to a fragmented group over 50% furniture sales people."
"As an architect practice interior architecture (100%) I feel the profession
and the licensing boards do not have a good grasp of the ways firms practice
nor the limited risk to the public. Shell and core architects are a different
discipline and interior designers are as well."
"I have seen the client exhibit such a lack of confidence in the architect
that they hire a construction manager at a fee equal to or greater than the
architect's. The CM's contract then was written to be more a watchdog on the
architect than the contractor
."
"Losing control of our profession to outside sources (city agencies,
design review boards, homeowner associations, contractors, etc."
35 raised concerns with the quality of architectural education and the lack of business training, and 17 mentioned the gap between education and practice preparation for interns. Some found the exam now too easy, others felt internship should last longer.
38
raised the issue of technology with some concerned with the cost
and time needed to keep up with changes, while others expressed the concern
of the impact of CADD-only trained interns.
"
overspecialization and affording the resources to keep abreast
of technology."
On the regulation side, 41 raised code issues with
the majority seeking standardization and one uniform code. 24 felt that the
profession was over-regulated or that regulations were not keeping up with
technology. 4 mentioned problems with over-interpretation of accessibility
and 7 mention problems with public works procedures. 31 cited the lack of
training and professionalism of building officials and planning departments.
11 mentioned the need to "hang tough" on enforcement and to pressure
CID to improve building departments.
"I am a Native American and I work on Indian reservations quite often
- state boards should understand conditions on tribal lands and work to mutually
benefit each authority."
3. How would you rate the NMBEA overall in terms of services it provides?
1208 responses
|
Poor
|
Below
Average |
Average
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
|
5
|
14
|
169
|
612
|
408
|
4. Other comments (Registrants generally continued their answer to question #2 under this question. The staff has integrated the answers into the responses to question #2.)
